philip clark sex tape
So if you've spent more than fifteen minutes on the internet this week, you've probably heard all about the Paris Hilton sex video.
I must say, I was very surprised to find out about a supposed "Philip Clark sex tape" that's currently making the rounds.
For the record, let me state once and for all: THE PHILIP CLARK SEX TAPE IS A FAKE.
I downloaded it myself. The video appears to be shot using the night-vision feature of a cheap DV cam. Someone who is supposed to be me is seen romping with a couple of women and engaging in all sorts of shocking activities.
At one point, "Philip" interrupts the proceedings to go check his email. Note: I WOULD NEVER DO THAT.
Plus the audio quality is so poor that it would be an embarrassment to anyone who calls himself a professional sound engineer. The least they could have done is used the Sony ECM-MS907 stereo condenser microphone, which is specifically designed for recording homemade porn soundtracks. (Don't ask me how I knew that.)
Here is a screenshot from the fake Philip Clark sex tape. DON'T BE FOOLED:

Comments
hmmmm that looks like someone eles i know!!
interesting!!!
good, but for sure not you
Posted by: katy | November 19, 2003 09:12 PM
How dare they!
Posted by: HisHighness | November 19, 2003 11:05 PM
Oh my sweet god, phil
I mean to say two things, as being of primary importance
a) I am glad you enjoy sex, you know what makes you come and you have a positive image of your sexuality
b) I am also glad to read your website (although this is the first and last time), because I think it is good to talk about sex in an open way (which is why i put my last name and email address, i am not a pussy). I am about to blast you (although, somewhat inarticulately), but the irony is not lost on me that if you didn't print your opinions for all to see this conversation would not exist. so thank you for this opportunity.
That being said, you are totally creepy about sex. I cannot imagine a single women who would want to have sex with you after reading your weird, weird thoughts about it. I understand I am being vague, but there is SO MUCH that really gives me the willies about you. Please, please make me see why you are right... because other wise I may have to lock up all the daughters I know and stop smiling pleasantly at you on the streets.
No, truly I am very grossed out right now.
Posted by: kate mckenna | November 20, 2003 12:29 AM
sorry kate, but "creepy" and "weird" doesn't really give me much to respond to.
until you choose to stop being vague, there is little to prevent me from assuming that your dislike of my blog is symptomatic of a general squeamishness about sex.
at the very least, i might be tempted to assume that you are merely just another part of what makes halifax so conservative.
also: one of your comments gives me reason to suspect that you have broken a law of the internet by posting to a website without first reading the faq.
Posted by: phi. | November 20, 2003 03:48 PM
wow kate, if your nose gets any higher up in the air we'll be able to sell advertising on it goodyear style!
Posted by: HisHighness | November 20, 2003 04:42 PM
i have never been more turned on...
Posted by: joujou | November 20, 2003 05:40 PM
OK, I won't ask.
Scratch that, I CANNOT resist. Please tell me you gained that knowledge as a result of being a professional sound engineer! I'd hate to think that we're missing out on numerous unpublished blog entries on Phil's adventures in home pornography.... ?
Posted by: Anonymous | November 20, 2003 05:50 PM
OK,
Here's is my attempt to be Un-vague, or as i like to call it specific.
1) i am wary of people who spend too much time thinking about sex, because i find them to become very unhappy as they get older
2) having one kind of sex is boring: to have, to read about, to fantasize about - to me, the sex described in your "blog" (is that the right word?) lacks variety, so it's boring. Now, here one might say, "But, Kate, Phil has sex with all sorts of different women all the time. He's got more variety than Joe" But, I would respond by saying that the personalities of these women don't seem to figure large in Phil's encouters, they are more just the "everywomen" we learned about in grade 11 english. It's was a bland theme then, and it still is now. It is the same quasi-anonymous, "no strings attached", pick-up, commons, story again and again. Any apparent variety is superficial.
3) when i had a lot of sex like that, it was because i felt shitty about myself. I'm not saying you feel shitty about yourself, but, probably, a lot of the women you write about do, and so there's this sad element to your stories, that i don't even think you pick up on, so that makes me really uncomfortable reading them. I think, yeah and then she went home and cried, cried, cried about how no one will ever love her. bad times.
4) i like open minds - anyone who is a sworn anything is a little stale, be it bachelor, zionist, or in-line roller blader.
5) no, as much as i fear more retorts from his highness (good one, by the way). sometimes you seem a little insensitive to the situation and use weird lines like you would hear in a movie of the week about date rape. no, i am not accusing you of date rape, or calling you an a-hole. i'm just refering to your diction.
I really like the 101 things about Philip Clark. Now that's gold. and i did read your faq. i got bored and skipped a bunch though.
In conclusion I assume soms things about you and your ideas of sex from your blog that make me think that you are boring, closed-minded, and soon-to-be an unhappy old man. Tell me why I am wrong.
I am not sqeamish about sex. I am not conservative (well I am in some ways, I am a very linear thinker and I like order, government, and rules)about sex. I think sex is a means to many good, good ends. But, not an end in itself. Maybe that is conservative.
Kate
and one more thing, once I had a dream about fucking you, because my best friend did, and I always have dreams about fucking the people she's fucked (weird, i know) and you were so noisy that my neighbours called the cops. not just normal noise, but like singing country songs and un-sexy animal imitations. you were just making noise. i kept saying "would you shut the fuck up and concentrate", but you just kept on singing k.d. lang. what do you think about that?
Posted by: kate mckenna | November 20, 2003 10:32 PM
Personally I think that dream sounds a little creepy and it's weird weird to constantly have dreams about fucking people your friend fucked, but it seems you're already aware of that.
Posted by: MarkBlack | November 20, 2003 10:39 PM
And I wasn't just trying to be an asshole I just find it odd that you would say that you're grossed out by Phil's site and his meanderings/stories and then solicit his opinion on a rather 'different' situation. It just seems that part of you is intrigued by the existence of this site and the content and another part of you is grossed out that you're intrigued. I could be wrong, but it'd go aways to explain why you came back to post your last diatribe and then solicit Phil's opinion on your dream.
Posted by: MarkBlack | November 20, 2003 10:46 PM
yes,
i am interested in phil's opinion. i do find him intriguing, I never said i didn't; i like to talk to people whose perspective on life diverges greatly from mine. i shared that dream because i wanted to even things out, a bit. it's not really fair that i am critcizing him based on all this personal information, while I can remain totally anonymous and impersonal. AND i've solicited his opinion the whole time. that's why i posted in the first place. i don't think it was that out of character.
when i used the word gross, i didn't mean like "oooo i've never heard of someone getting a blow job from a girl they didn't know before". I did mean "oooooo that person is eating an entire chocolate cheesecake". like, too much gross. also, the use of the word man-batter sends bad messages to my brain: "warning, ostensibly mature male may actually be trying to sleep with high school girls".
nice use of the word diatribe, smarty pants.
kate
Posted by: kate mckenna | November 21, 2003 11:19 AM
I'm sure most people who have completed high school know and can use diatribe in a sentence. It's not like I used philippic, obloquy, or fulmination.
I think you make some serious jumps in logic especially with this "warning, ostensibly mature male may actually be trying to sleep with high school girls". I mean after I read your 'dream' scenario that I may have thought was gross, or excuse me, 'too much' (I do understand context, so I did understand what you meant earlier by gross), I didn't say "warning: bitter woman is secretly envious of the fact that Philip slept with her friend and now wants to test the waters."
Posted by: MarkBlack | November 21, 2003 03:17 PM
you're right, i was bitter. i was 16 and she used to get all these awesome guys, and i was a big, big loser. or so i thought. now, i'm much more confident. thanks for the concern. i feel better after talking.
Posted by: kate mckenna | November 21, 2003 04:49 PM
Kate, how do you feel about women who have sex with lots of different people? How about if that woman doesn't feel shitty about herself, but rather likes herself better now than she ever has before? What about if that woman is married? What if her husband knows about and encourages her other sexual relationships?
Remember that this is a blog - you only see part of the picture, only that part that Phil chooses to share with you. If you don't like it, don't read it.
Posted by: TwiddlyBits | November 21, 2003 10:29 PM
"If you don't like it, don't read it."? I think if a fella has a website devoted
to his musings and opinions, and he includes a handy, easy-to-use forum for
talking back, he's expecting a little back-talk. I see no evidence that he's
going to break down and cry like a schoolgirl/boy when faced with a little
discourse or, heaven forfend!, disagreement. While Kate's comments were
sometimes confused, sometimes just plain wrong by my reckoning, she's obviously
trying to to get her head around some stuff, she's not just spouting "you suck"
and "asshole" out of a passing virtual car. There's no need to baby the blogger,
I think Phil can handle a hot kitchen (alley, back seat of a bus). So Kate, keep
on reading stuff you don't like, it's good for you.
Posted by: lee | November 21, 2003 11:27 PM
i like kate's points of view. i think alot of them are valid and quite constructive. i myself, am religiously monogamous (sp?) but still find this blog quite entertaining. in my opinion, as blunt as it may be, is that the people who emotionally value sex are offended by the ones who dont (those who only have a recreational value of sex).
Posted by: metallicker | November 23, 2003 07:59 PM
dear twiddlybits:
i like anything that makes another person happy. if the person, in the situation you gave me, felt that she was making the right decision about her life, i would unconditionally support that. i'm not being self-righteous, that's what i believe. I would struggle with it maybe, and worry that she would get hurt, but I would try to support her.
wha do you think about someone who likes discussion and arguments? what if this person posted her opinion on a webpage that she found challenging to her sensibilities? would you be prepared to be accepting of that? seems like not a very big thing, but you weren't. maybe you should apply your free thinking to other issues. the whole "avoid what you don't understand" is at the core of the definition of "conservative".
Posted by: kate mckenna | November 24, 2003 12:40 PM
some of us read phil's 'weird, weird thoughts' about sex and want to sleep with him even more... or just roll around making out and getting felt up
those who can can see all aspects of sex (the mundane, the physical, the mental, the emotional, the lustful, the strange, and the silly) make better lovers... IMHO, anyway
Posted by: ThatGirl | November 25, 2003 01:19 AM
i agree about your second point. i once slept with someone who though you had to be serious in bed (ie no laughing). that didn't last long.
i guess phil's just not my type.
i think i would be bored with him.
Posted by: kate mckenna | November 25, 2003 01:56 PM
awww, kate, kate, please don't get bored of me
[puts on clown nose]
Posted by: phi. | November 25, 2003 09:48 PM
Many, many years ago Phil and I fooled around a little. I was crazy about him and I built him up to be really amazing sexually before I even kissed him. I am sure that he has improved otherwise this site would be full of women wanting their five minutes back.
Posted by: It doesn't matter | December 23, 2003 09:04 PM
hey, i know exactly who you are... i assure you, the sex would've been way better if you'd let me put that paper bag over your head.
Posted by: phi. | December 23, 2003 09:18 PM
I love this thread.
Posted by: Willy | March 27, 2004 02:20 PM
Hi!!!
Got to know smart guys :-) who do service across Russia :-)
Have ordered a fruit basket with them at www.asap.ru for my friend. The
least is that it's cheap, they made a picture and added a gift from company to go with my basket. They called
me first- then arranged
time with my friend and delivered on time I requested :-)
Can't believe it :-)
Can't help being surprised!!!
Posted by: seNse | August 19, 2004 10:41 PM